Justice at Smithfield
About the Campaign Contact US />
<area shape= Workers Voices About Smithfield Media Gallery Events Press Release

ACT NOW! SIGNUP TO OUR LIST

First Name
Last Name
E-mail
 

Press Release

For immediate release 10/15/07 Contact:  Leila McDowell 202 728 1829

STATEMENT FROM SMITHFIELD WORKERS IN TAR HEEL, NORTH CAROLINA ABOUT COMPANY BREAKING OFF TALKS

Workers cite harassment and intimidation inside the plant and violations of the law. Legal charges to be filed.

It is with great disappointment and sadness that we have learned that our employer, Smithfield Foods, has called off talks with the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW). Over the past summer, thousands of us signed petitions to the company asking for union representation and for a process "without the threats, abuses and interference that we have seen in the past."  Our desire to vote and our overwhelming support for a union is clear.  We agreed that the UFCW should try to find out if they could get an agreement with the company to allow us a free and fair process to choose union representation.

The UFCW and Smithfield have engaged in lengthy talks about a process that would allow us the democratic right to choose.  We are seeking a free and fair process that would protect our rights and allow us to make our choice without the threat of heavy-handed company interference or influence.

The UFCW was willing to agree to a process other than majority sign-up election, which was our first choice. We appreciate the willingness of the company to consider an election under a different set of rules than the failed National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) elections of the past.  But Smithfield would not agree to the most important condition of all: that the company would not use any pressure tactics to discourage workers from voting for a union. 

This is a key point for us.  Smithfield has a long history of violating the law during two previous NLRB elections at our plant and at election at its Wilson, North Carolina plant.  During the first election in 1994 they committed serious violations and fired several pro-union workers.  After the Labor Board issued a complaint Smithfield agreed to a second election in 1997 and promised not to do the same thing. In fact their conduct was worse. They even brought the county Sheriffs in and created an armed camp on the days we voted.   The legal rulings found that Smithfield assaulted, intimidated, threatened, illegally fired and even hurled racial slurs at the workers during the election.  Smithfield's actions during the 1997 election terrorized the workforce.  Years later, workers still clearly remember how workers were fired, threatened and harassed.

In May 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld all the charges that the Labor Board found against the company.  Unfortunately, while the Court forced the company to pay back wages and rehire the fired workers, Smithfield never openly admitted they did anything wrong. This made us doubt their claims of "changing their ways."  

Since the May, 2006 ruling, Smithfield has continued its aggressive campaign to harass and intimidate us from choosing to have UFCW representation at work.  We work under unsafe conditions that Smithfield refuses to address.  Injured workers are denied good medical treatment and cast aside.  And Smithfield continues to intimidate and retaliate against workers who speak out for worker rights.  Several of the strongest and most outspoken union supporters were fired over the past nine months. Smithfield has illegally discouraged workers from distributing literature and has even issued its own literature that is threatening and illegal.  For months daily TV ads have been running on English and Spanish stations comparing UFCW organizers to Mafia thugs scaring workers in their homes.

Every month hundreds of new hires are shown a video that lies about the company's role in attacking workers rights during previous NLRB elections.  The company illegally asks new hires to sign a letter written by the company calling for another election like the ones that have failed in the past. This is a violation of Federal labor law and we are filing charges.  Smithfield even has signs up in the plant that say that union organizers are like roaches.   Our movement is not about outside union organizers.  Our efforts are led by workers like us who continue to organize for a union voice.  Our employer is calling us "roaches" for wanting a union in our workplace.

These violations continued throughout the summer while the UFCW was talking to the company in good faith about giving us a real democratic process. 

We will continue to struggle for a union until we win.  We sincerely hope that the company will come back to the table at some point and agree to a genuine fair process that allows us to vote without company pressure.   We know that a union at the plant will benefit the company, the workers and our entire state through increased safety, lower turnover and a happier and more productive workforce.   We have seen that Smithfield has maintained a good relationship with its UFCW-represented workers in twenty-three other locations around the U.S.  We believe that those of us working here in North Carolina deserve to be treated with the same respect afforded to our UFCW brothers and sisters at Smithfield.  The company needs to understand this fact and then we can move forward together. 

Smithfield Workers for a Fair Choice

 

 

Take Action

video

  • DC City Council introduces resolution condemning Smithfield Foods for creating an environment of intimidation and fear for workers and encourages all supermarkets and vendors in DC from stocking Smithfield meat products. Click for a copy of the resolution in html or as a pdf.

  • The August '08 issue of Business North Carolina features a cover story on the Justice@Smithfield campaign. Read the article in html or as a pdf.

  • New York Times columnist Adam Liptak discusses the lawsuit against Justice@Smithfield and the First Amendment. Read the column.

  • Fayetteville Observer: "Ruling forbids Smithfield Packing using threats"
  • The March '08 cover story in Labor Notes asks, "Is Fighting for Justice at Smithfield Racketeering?"
  • Smithifield's Tar Heel workers win a paid Martin Luther King Holiday. Read the press release.
  • Avram Lyon says when he sees Paula Deen on TV, "all I can think of are the people working under horrible conditions at Smithfield." Read his article in the Forward.
  • Breast Cancer foundation sues Smithfield Foods for trademark violation.
  • Read Justice@Smithifield's statement on the U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit court ruling on Smithfield.
  • The final quarter of Paula Deen's hour-long appearence on NPR's Diane Rehm Show Nov. 28 was dominated by questions over her association with Smithfield Foods. Listen to the show using Windows Media Viewer or Real Player.
  • On Thursday, November 8, 2007, activists with the Western Massachusetts Jobs With Justice organized a protest outside a brand new Big Y supermarket in Northampton. Read More.
  • On September 12, the Bergen County (NJ) Central Trades and Labor Council passed a resolution calling on Smithfield to "[o]bey the law, by providing a safe workplace, giving Smithfield workers the right to chose a union...free from interferene of any kind."
  • On August 6, Smithfield Tar Heel plant worker Jose Ozorio Figueroa was terminated. Company representatives claim it was for showing up four minutes late to his shift, but Ozorio believes that he was fired for his union activities. Read his statement.
  • Presidential Master Chef Talli V. Counsel asks celebrity chef Paula Deen to use her influence to end the “brutal working conditions” at Smithfield’s Tar Heel Plant. Read more.
  • On August 1, 2007, the City of Boston passed a resolution calling on the city to "review its purchasing of any products from the Smithfield Packing Company in Tar Heel, North Carolina....and suspend these purchases until the company ends all form of abuse, inimidation and violence against its workers..." It also encourages Boston supermarkets "to consider suspending their purchase of any Smithfield products..."
  • On Saturday, July 14, dozens of Nashville clergy, civil rights leaders and consumers rallied to demand that two area supermarkets to stop stocking Smithfield Foods pork products made at the company’s Tar Heel plant.  Read more.

  • More than 100 supporters rallied in front of a Publix supermarket in Atlanta to demand that the market stop carrying pork products from Smithfield's Tar Heel plant. Read More.

  • More than 250 family members and supporters of Smithfield Workers delivered a Father’s Day Card to Harris Teeter’s president. Read the news coverage [With Video].

  • On June 4, the City of Cambridge, MA unanimously passed a resolution in support Smithfield workers in Tar Heel. Read the historic resolution.
  • Children of Smithfield workers will deliver a Father's Day card to Harris Teeter's President Download the flyer.

video


News coverage from WAXN in Charlotte. On June 30th dozens of supporters rallied outside a Paula Deen show to demand justice for Smithfield workers.

Copirights by United Food and Commercial Workers Inaternational Union